Cleverly written response, but the picture remains the same,
**regardless** of intent or the thought behind it. Thank you for the
courtesy of a reply. What did you mean at the end of your email "Will
you your love then?"? If you're busy, no reply is ok. Best of luck.
(And please don't tell me the word *withhold* is missing) Yikes.

And you left out DE cadent MI MOORE who turns out to be less.

Oh well. Just because *some* women choose to demean themselves, does not
make it ok for other people to do so. Too bad email does not allow bold
and italics.

Simply because generational transfer of true values has eroded such that
the latest generation to reach their 20's has little appreciation for the
sanctity of the marriage relationship and the freedom only available
within that relationship in its proper expression, does not mean that
it's ok to demean the female form through its bare public display.

Now, I do appreciate that your site has shown considerable restraint
relative to some other web sites. That does not make your site's use of
the bare female form acceptable or appropriate. Nuff said...more than
enuf actually.

I guess what grated me so harshly was that I had pulled the page out of
Interactive Age or some mag which had this great writeup on some sites
for women (not of women), and I was looking forward to a site which would
show appreciation for finer aspects of women. And I was met with one of
the most base uses of women: their bare female form used to attract
attention to something.

Well, as I said, best of luck and thanx for the courteous response.

cj